pretending we're in Love

madeofeyebrows:

thegoodsonisbad:

thestray:

steveagee:

please watch this and don’t click “like”, click “reblog”. 

I had to pause this a couple times to cry for 5 minutes. You need to watch this. It’s beyond important.

as much as i may make fun of tumblr, if this site has shown me anything its that people know how to spread the word effectively

so reblog if you can, dudes

Gave me a strong case of the “Paladin Rage”.

But no, in all seriousness, this is important.

xombiedirge:

Chun Li & Balrog by Pete Han

kidsnevergrowup:

let’s take a moment and just… appreciate stuff

starexorcist:

tehmostaewsumblogevar:

starexorcist:

ecrusher:

10knotes:

M&Ms Droplets

now that’s what photography should be about… not a black and white picture of someone’s shoes

The top picture is full of M&M’s. They’re bule, red, orange, green, yellow, and brown.

But in the bottom picture we clearly see there’s white, pink, and even purple candies in the bowl.

The bottom picture is of gumballs! This concludes that the bottom picture is not taken with that camera at all. I’d even go as far to say that it was edited in photoshop with a filter!

Yes the above image and the below image are not the same photograph being taken. This is rather obvious.

BUT Mr. Wright there is one thing you overlooked. Examine the droplets on the bottom image. None of them are from the same angle. This is a natural occurance when looking through water droplets.

Is it not possible that the photographer took the second image first?

Would it not be more probable that when asked HOW it was taken he/she took the above image of their setup Using M&Ms, something much more common in a household rather than many gumballs, something they may have just bought for the original photo? 

So to claim it was not taken with the same camera is indeed a long shot Mr. Wright.

Thank you for your time.

Really Edgeworth, is that you’re argument.

Aren’t you overlooking the fact that there are no pink M&Ms. This proves undeniably that these are not, in fact M&Ms, but some other kind of candy.

And one other thing, I find it highly improbable that not one piece of candy is facing so the M logo is on the candy.

So in conclusion, there is no way these are possibly M&Ms.

hey mister I think you’re confuuuuuuused. Edgeworth agreed that they weren’t M&M’s. He was just refuting that there is a possibility there wasnt any photoshop used and that the above image was only depicting the method used in the bottom image.

I think someone might be getting a little senile hehehe

insanelygaming:

Legend of Zelda Rap - by Smosh

Note: Please don’t skip out on watching this, it’s crucial.